Explain why Tayo blames himself for the six year drought.
Carefully re-read the pages that involve the old medicine man, Ku’oosh, p. 31-34. Explain the significance of how Ku’oosh speaks, chooses words, and of his point about the fragility of the world.
Struggling to make sense of the Old Ku’oosh, Tayo was bombarded with the medicine man’s regurgitated words of wisdom and talk of unfamiliar places, verbally offered to him in an outdated dialect. Ku’oosh explained to Tayo that “the world is fragile,” and did so in a long, thorough process. This is because, as Silko explains, the meaning of the word “fragile” holds “the intricacies of a continuing process, and with a strength inherent in spider webs woven across paths through sand hills where early in the morning the sun becomes entangled in each filament of the web.” Because the term’s connotation is so complex, and “no word exists alone,” Ku’oosh defends his diction by providing a story for each word’s purpose. From this, it is clear that Ku’oosh holds his message to be highly valuable, so much that every utterance in his narration had to be fully grasped. Furthermore, the medicine man taught that this whole procedure was the project of humanity, a system that required “great patience and love.”
I really liked your explanations for both questions. They were extremely thought out and thorough. You seem to have a very good understanding of the story so far.
ReplyDeleteI really like your response to the first question. I actually didn't realize that he thought "damning the rain" was the reason for the drought.
ReplyDeleteGreat responses. Concise, yet clearly analyzed with strong evidence from the text. I especially like the way you describe the plot within your argument in the first response.
ReplyDeleteyour response to the second question was very detailed and brought a great insight to what you believed about Ku'oosh. i really enjoyed reading it!
ReplyDeleteI thought your response to the first questions was very detailed, and fully explained why he would blame himself for the drought.
ReplyDeleteYour response to the second question was well thought out and helpful. I failed to pick up on many of the things you mentioned in your response. Not only that, but your writing flows very well from one idea to the next and everything made sense to me.
ReplyDeleteYour response to the first question was your best. You have a great concise style. Great work!
ReplyDelete